Review of Evaluating Stress, Immunity, and Growth Performance of Beef Cattle Under Intensive Farming Systems

Authors

  • Aulia Rahmatulaili Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang, Indonesia
  • Wardani, A. Y Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang, Indonesia
  • Arlana, D. R. P Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang, Indonesia
  • Hidayatulloh, E. S. Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang, Indonesia
  • Saputra, R. D Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang, Indonesia
  • Wijoyo, I. A Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang, Indonesia
  • Nurdianti Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34145/ivas.v1i1.3870

Keywords:

Animal Welfare, Beef Cattle Stress, Growth Performance, Immune Response, Sustainability

Abstract

Intensive beef cattle farming systems are used to increase efficiency in meat production. However, these systems often cause animal welfare issues. Pressure from pen density, management practices, and environmental conditions can cause stress that directly impacts the health and growth of livestock. This article discusses the relationship between physiological stress levels, immune responses, and beef cattle growth in intensive systems, as well as the importance of proper management to support the sustainability of beef cattle farming. From previous studies, stress can be observed through increased cortisol hormone levels and changes in animal behavior. Immune responses can be determined through white blood cell counts, antibody levels, and vaccination effectiveness. Growth is usually assessed using parameters such as average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and body condition score (BCS). Research also shows that high stress is negatively associated with the immune system, as seen in decreased antibodies and changes in blood profiles. In addition, high cortisol levels cause decreased food consumption, metabolic disorders, decreased feed efficiency, and decreased weight gain. In conclusion, management that prioritizes animal welfare, such as regulate stocking density, providing high-quality feed, and controlling stress, is a key factor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayemele, A. G., Oloruntola, O. D., & Agbede, J. O. (2021). Antioxidant supplementation as a strategy to reduce oxidative stress in feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, 105(6), 1304–1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13594

Baraa, R. A., Al-Rubaie, M. S., & Al-Khafaji, A. H. (2025). Chronic cortisol elevation and immune suppression in intensively reared cattle. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 272, 111780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2025. 111780

Dahl, G. E., Tao, S., & Laporta, J. (2020). Heat stress impacts on lactating cows: A review. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(6), 5740–5751.

Garcia-Torres, S., Cabezas, A., & Tejerina, D. (2021). Physiological stress biomarkers and their relationship to meat quality in beef cattle. Meat Science, 181, 108609.

Gouvêa, V. N., Leme, P. R., Pereira, A. S. C., & Tullio, R. R. (2022). Stress physiology and its impact on feed efficiency in beef cattle under confinement. Livestock Science, 259, 104877.

Handayani, M., & Yusuf, M. A. (2025). Physiological and biochemical indicators of chronic stress in tropical beef cattle. Indonesian Journal of Animal Bioscience, 7(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijab.2025.1524

Hartono, A., & Lestari, D. W. (2025). Integrating animal welfare and production performance in intensive cattle systems. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 38(4), 650–662. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.25.00312

Huang, X., Zhang, L., & Zhao, J. (2023). Selenium and vitamin E synergistically enhance antioxidant capacity and immune function in beef cattle. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1156498.

Kim, W. S., Lee, J. S., & Park, S. H. (2021). Behavioral and physiological responses of beef cattle to heat stress under intensive rearing. Animals, 11(9), 2645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092645

Knezevic, I., Vujanovic, D., & Andjelkovic, J. (2023). Stress physiology and endocrine adaptation in beef cattle production. Animals, 13(12), 2034.

Lu, L., Zhang, Q., & Zhu, R. (2018). Effect of pre-slaughter stress on muscle glycogen depletion and meat quality in cattle. Meat Science, 145, 207–214.

Maulana, A., & Sari, N. (2025). Oxidative stress and antioxidant response in beef cattle during transportation and feedlot conditions. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 48(1), 55– 67. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2025.48.1. 55

Megahed, A. A., Gad, A. Y., & El-Sayed, A. (2023). Cortisol-mediated metabolic shifts in stressed beef cattle and their effects on productivity. Journal of Animal Science, 101(3), skad056. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skad056

Otten, W., Puppe, B., & Kanitz, E. (2023). Neuroendocrine regulation of growth and stress adaptation in cattle. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 83, 106859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2023.106859

Pagliasso, E., Marchesini, G., & Andrighetto, I. (2023). The impact of stress on blood parameters and inflammatory markers in beef cattle. Veterinary Research Communications, 47, 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10033-4

Prasetyo, R., & Rahayu, S. (2024). Effects of stocking density and ventilation on physiological stress responses in feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Research and Production, 12(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.24843/jarp.2024.12.02.77

Shabtay, A. (2025). Welfare-oriented handling practices and stress reduction in cattle production. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4, 1342579.

Siregar, R., & Alam, M. (2024). Behavioral and physiological indicators of welfare in intensively managed cattle. Indonesian Journal of Animal Husbandry, 9(1), 15– 24. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijah.2024.015

Utami, N. W., & Kurniawan, T. (2024). Pre- slaughter handling stress and its effect on meat quality in tropical beef cattle. Veterinary World, 17(5), 1032–1040. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2024.1032-1040

Wein, S., Fisher, A., & Beausoleil, N. J. (2024). Environmental enrichment improves welfare and productivity in confined ruminants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 267, 105868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2024.105868

Widodo, A., Kurnia, H., & Darmawan, I. (2023). Microclimate control and welfare assessment of beef cattle under tropical intensive systems. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 55, 371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03717-9

Handayani, M., & Yusuf, M. A. (2025). Physiological and biochemical indicators of chronic stress in tropical beef cattle. Indonesian Journal of Animal Bioscience, 7(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijab.2025.1524

Hartono, A., & Lestari, D. W. (2025). Integrating animal welfare and production performance in intensive cattle systems. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 38(4), 650–662. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.25.00312

Maulana, A., & Sari, N. (2025). Oxidative stress and antioxidant response in beef cattle during transportation and feedlot conditions. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 48(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2025.48.1.55

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Rahmatulaili, A., Y, W. A., P, A. D. R., S., H. E., D, S. R., A, W. I., & Nurdianti. (2026). Review of Evaluating Stress, Immunity, and Growth Performance of Beef Cattle Under Intensive Farming Systems. International Vocational Agriculture Symposium, 1(1), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.34145/ivas.v1i1.3870

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.